Structured PREreview of Dados de replicação para: Acidentes de trabalho com exposição a material biológico: análise comparativa entre os estados de Goiás e Minas Gerais, Brasil, 2015–2024

by Chad Sansing

How would you rate the quality of this data set?: Excellent; Test
Does this dataset follow FAIR and CARE principles?: Yes; Test
Does the dataset have enough metadata?: Yes; Test
Does this dataset include a way to list or track changes or versions? If so, does it seem accurate?: Yes; Test
Does this dataset show signs of alteration beyond instances of likely human error, such as censorship, deletion, or redaction, that are not accounted for otherwise?: No; Test
Is the dataset well-suited to support its stated research purpose?: Yes; Test
Does this dataset support the researcher’s stated conclusions?: Yes; Test
Is the dataset granular enough to be a reliable standard of measurement?: Yes; Test
Is the dataset relatively error-free?: Yes; Test
Is this dataset likely to be of interest to researchers in its corresponding field of study, to most researchers, or to the general public? How consequential is it likely to seem to that audience or those audiences?: Very consequential; Test
Is this dataset ready to be shared?: Yes; Test
What else, if anything, would it be helpful for the researcher to include with this dataset to make it easier to find, understand and reuse in ethical and responsible ways?: Test

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.